<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>Ja4 on Vitalii Zaiats</title>
    <link>https://vitalii-zaiats.com/tags/ja4/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Ja4 on Vitalii Zaiats</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://vitalii-zaiats.com/tags/ja4/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>A TLS fingerprint won&#39;t tell you it&#39;s a bot — what it reaches for will</title>
      <link>https://vitalii-zaiats.com/posts/tls-behaviour-not-resemblance/</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://vitalii-zaiats.com/posts/tls-behaviour-not-resemblance/</guid>
      <description>Most tools ask whether a TLS fingerprint resembles Chrome. I wanted a different question — how does it behave? So I sat inside a residential proxy network, named a million handshakes, and found the bulk of the &amp;lsquo;bot&amp;rsquo; traffic isn&amp;rsquo;t faking Chrome. It&amp;rsquo;s driving it.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
